Community Isn’t Free

However, cheap cialis pill anecdotal evidence points to some side effects when discontinuing use, no prescription diovan such as irregular menstrual cycles, weight changes, and acne. If nexium buy online a doctor has prescribed an adrenaline autoinjector or Epi-Pen, caregivers cheap viagra internet should administer it according to the doctor's instructions. Dosage for cheap estrace from canada adults not taking an ESAIf you're not already taking an buy lumigan without prescription ESA, your starting Jesduvroq dosage depends on the level of triamterene sale Hgb in your blood. Another comprehensive review of evidence, published diflucan online last year in the journal Clinical Psychology Review, revealed that buy triamterene sale using cannabis may help people with alcohol or opioid dependencies azor for order to fight their addictions. People should speak with a doctor buy generic diclofenac problems if they experience severe eye pain, vision loss, or extensive overnight cialis floaters after laser cataract surgery. Cut out all milk, ice buy discount amoxicillin cream, yogurt, cottage cheese, and other dairy products for a clozapine purchase low free price few days and see if the symptoms disappear. However, many people.

Image source

At Eclipse, we talk a lot about community. Developing a community is an important part of being an open source project. It is from a community of users, adopters, and contributors that a project draws strength and longevity. Without a community, an open source project is just a bunch of code that might as well buried on a server behind a firewall somewhere in parts unknown.

I can’t think of a single open source project that has found community success through a simple application of "if you build it, they will come". Some projects are luckier than others: sometimes a technology is just so compelling that minimal effort returns huge dividends. More often, the overnight success of an open source project comes after weeks, months, and years of a combination of long work and hard work.

It takes effort to get your message out; and if you want to develop a community around your open source project, you have to get the message out. To cultivate a vibrant community of users, adopters, and committers, a project has to have somebody who is responsible for community development. Somebody has to own it. Everybody on the project team has to dedicate some significant amount of their time to community development, but one person on the team has to be responsible for it. For some projects, this may be a full time job; for others, it may be a huge part of one. In fact, may open source projects have more than one full time person working on community development. In some circles, this role might be called the project’s evangelist, or maybe it’s the project lead that manages community development. Whatever the title, the role should be that of making everybody else successful in community development activities.

: Continue reading :

email

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook

Posted: June 1st, 2011
at 1:14am by mnp


Categories: development

Comments: No comments



 

Leave a Reply