Archive for October, 2007

Politricks in Iran

Neuroimaging discount cialis has found that while a person imagines something during hypnosis, compazine for order similar areas of the brain activate when a person has purchase cheap cialis online canada those experiences in reality. Sometimes if these medications are ineffective, kenalog no prescription a healthcare or mental health professional may recommend antipsychotic medication cheap griseofulvin to help manage symptoms. Alternatively, a person can learn more buy discount tetracycline about their individual risk factors for heart attack by speaking generic zofran with a healthcare professional. Doctors will determine which treatment option buy cheap betnovate online is best suited for each individual, depending on the type cheap glucophage of leukemia and the stage. And males typically have lower cheapest cialis prices levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL), or "good," cholesterol at any celexa generic age. If you're pregnant, breastfeeding, or planning for either, tell lasix online your doctor before starting Monjuvi. For example, residential segregation in the.

From our politricks.mnp:

Sorry for the recent lack of posts, had to take the weekend off to watch the Red Sox finish their World Series sweep. (My condolences to the Rockies and their fans. They had one hell of a run, they’ll definitely get another shot in the next few years.)

With the baseball season in the books, time to get back to politics. I promised y’all more stuff on Iran, and I do like to keep to that sort of promise. So let’s head in and get to the bottom of what may well be our third war in six years. We’ll start with a bit of historical background.

mossadegh

Any understanding of US-Iran relations needs to start with this guy. Mohammed Mossadegh, prime minister of Iran in the early 50’s, led his country on a number of reforms, most notably and controversially the nationalization of the oil industry, until then controlled by the British-owned Anglo-Iranian Oil Company. The Brits, amazingly enough, were annoyed by the loss of their oil, and asked the United States to take action. The CIA, in their inimitable way, put money into the right hands, and a military coup d’etat swept Mossadegh out of power in favor of the Shah.
This move proved fairly unpopular among the Iranian people, and thus the Shah maintained his power through the grand traditions of torture, repression, and secret police. He was supported in these endeavors, both financially and militarily, by the United States, who saw him as a valuable ally against Soviet expansion. Decades of oppression finally bubbled over in the Islamic Revolution of 1978-9, the rise of Ayatollah Khomeini’s theocratic government, and the seizing of the American Embassy in Tehran. Relations between the two countries entered a rather tense phase, with Iran supporting various anti-American terrorist causes (most notably Hezbollah) and the US supporting pretty much anyone who opposed the Ayatollah. For example, this guy, who you may recognize from his many appearances on South Park:

Saddam Hussein

Tensions eased a bit in the mid-90’s, largely due to a more moderate tone from the Iranian government toward the West and a generally receptive administration in the United States. After 9/11, Iran offered some cooperation (how much is still a matter of argument, there’s an excellent set of opinions here) against the Taliban and al-Qaeda in Afghanistan. Then, of course, we had the 2002 State of the Union and the "Axis of Evil" designation, followed by the invasion of Iraq. The hardliners within the Iranian government saw both (not unreasonably) as hostile moves, and used the opportunity to reassert control, purging the moderates and taking every opportunity to condemn American aggression.

And so here we sit, with Iran’s president giving bellicose speeches across the globe and our Congress declaring part of Iran’s military a terrorist organization. We’ve got prominent foreign policy analysts claiming that Iranians "have terrorism in their DNA." It’s beginning to look very much as though the question of the United States attacking Iran is one of "when," not "if."

President Bush has apparently said on several occasions that he doesn’t want to leave Iran’s nuclear program as an unresolved issue after he leaves office. Yes, that’s right. A $9 trillion national debt, a still-flooded New Orleans, a collapsing healthcare system, and 130,000 troops in Iraq can be left to the next guy, but Iran we’ve gotta bomb tomorrow. And if you think Congress will stop him, you haven’t been paying much attention. For one thing, the new Democratic majority has been, shall we say, less than assertive in standing up to the President on matters of war.

For another, this is an Administration that has repeatedly made it clear that it feels Congress has absolutely no authority over the Presidency where war is concerned. Dick Cheney has said publicly that the first President Bush would have had the authority to invade Iraq in 1991 even if Congress had voted against it. Even better, remember that little resolution I mentioned earlier, which laid the groundwork for the President to declare part of Iran’s military a "supporter of terrorism"? Consider it in the context of the Sept. 14th, 2001 "Authorization for Use of Military Force," effectively declaring the "War on Terror" underway. If part of Iran’s military is a terrorist group, then (according to these blokes) the President has the right to attack it without Congressional permission. And if the rest of Iran’s military counterattacks, then they’re supporting terrorists, and we get to go after them, too.

I wish I could say that this is a fluke, that if Congress can just find its spine for the next year or so and run out the clock on the Bushies, we’ll avoid a war. I’m more than a bit worried, though. Take a look at this debate, from Talking Points Memo:

YouTube Preview Image

The dude who doesn’t seem to understand the difference between Nazi Germany and, as Paul Krugman put it, "a country with roughly the G.D.P. of Connecticut" is Norman Podhoretz, who in addition to being the dean of Washington’s neoconservative dingbats, is the chief foreign policy advisor to Rudy Giuliani, the GOP frontrunner for 2008. With that reassuring thought, I’m off to bed. With any luck I’ll have something cheerier for you tomorrow.

email

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook

Posted: October 31st, 2007
at 2:10pm by Black Ock


Categories: politricks,real life news

Comments: No comments


food for design

coffee_mode_01.jpg

YouTube Preview Image

coffee_mode_02.jpg

via food for design

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook

Posted: October 31st, 2007
at 1:53pm by Koookiecrumbles


Categories: youtube,music,art,grub

Comments: No comments


The Sozra Sound Project

The Sozra Sound Project

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook

Posted: October 31st, 2007
at 9:32am by Koookiecrumbles


Categories: music,art

Comments: No comments


The Rosslyn Stave Angel - Music Cipher

YouTube Preview Image

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook

Posted: October 31st, 2007
at 8:32am by Koookiecrumbles


Categories: myninjaplease,youtube,music,too good to be true,weaponry,architecture

Comments: No comments


COOKED UP DOPE

YouTube Preview Image

YouTube Preview Image

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook

Posted: October 31st, 2007
at 2:06am by Koookiecrumbles


Categories: youtube,music,business,weaponry

Comments: No comments


Warp your wallpaper

Wallpapering is placarding - why not react? Paper is sloppily slapped onto walls, disregarding the surface. Windows, door and switches rip holes into patterns, disrupting their continuity. Our product dissolves limits between architecture, wallpaper and hangings, with the wallpaper functioning as sensitve gobetween. So it’s time to: Warp your room!

warpable wallpaper from surrealien via

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook

Posted: October 30th, 2007
at 6:00pm by Koookiecrumbles


Categories: myninjaplease,art,too good to be true,home,architecture,design

Comments: No comments


Bell & Ross BR01-97

It is, quite frankly, one of the ugliest watches I have ever seen, but there is no denying its incredible precision and craftsmanship. I guess the reason I love this watch so much is it really sticks to its 4 tenets: water resistance, readability, precision, and performance. No where do they claim to focus on beauty. These 4 things are the mantra. Designers, engineers, and fabricators look to this with laser focus. Beauty is not in this equation. Ita€™s too abstract. And like many Swiss modernists that have come before Bell and Ross, the beauty is the product of following these four tenets.

designcrack

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook

Posted: October 30th, 2007
at 4:00pm by Koookiecrumbles


Categories: gear,design

Comments: 1 comment


Quote of the Day

I call architecture frozen music. -Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook

Posted: October 30th, 2007
at 2:54pm by Koookiecrumbles


Categories: music,architecture,quote of the day

Comments: No comments


Music for Piano with One or More Snare Drums (1990)

A pianist plays a series of notated pitches in chronological order, repeating them freely in overlapping patterns. As she does so, the tones sympathetically resonate snare drums positioned throughout the space. The drums respond in various ways depending on the pitch of the piano tones, the resonant regions of the drums and their geographical locations in space. This work was written for Hildegard Kleeb and was first performed by her on March 21, 1992, at the Galerie Sous-Sol, Geneva, Switzerland.

listen here

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook

Posted: October 30th, 2007
at 2:39pm by Koookiecrumbles


Categories: music,life,robots,weaponry,design,fo' real?,9th dan,science,boredom killer

Comments: No comments