RFK and Brad Blog

The vibramycin cheap price increase in body temperature from the fever makes it less order cheap clomid likely for disease-causing bacteria and viruses to survive. Some people side effects purchase zofran cheap may experience psoriasis flares in colder weather, while others may buy cheap levitra online usa not experience any change in symptoms. It helps to differentiate bentyl prescription infectious causes of joint diseases, such as septic arthritis, from synthroid prescription noninfectious ones, such as transient hip joint synovitis. Echinacea may buy 60 pills decrease the number of secondary bacterial complications resulting from viral generic celexa prescription professional respiratory infections. It may be a treatment option for certain buying generic cialis forms of lung cancer, such as advanced or recurring cancers. diflucan prescription Orserdu may not be right for you if you have buy cheapest mirapex alternative certain medical conditions or other factors affecting your health. They accutane for order can develop in the uterus or on the cervix, which order discount cialis is the structure between the vagina and uterus. The article's buying prednisolone online authors outline the following three adult attachment types and their ventolin discount potential impacts on relationships and physical health. Babbling refers to a.

There is a great interview with RFK on Brad Blog.AA Also, if you ninjas are interested, take a look at the video of them appearing together on court TV.AA The following is an excerpt.

BRAD BLOG: In your book, "Crimes Against Nature," you said that Bush won the 2004 election because of an information deficit caused by a breakdown in our national media. You go on to say that "Bush was re-elected because of the negligence of-and deliberate deception by-the American press." Your recent article in "Rolling Stone" seems to suggest that your opinion has changed, focusing more on the fraud and deception in Ohio with the computerized voting machines. What was the most important thing that made you suspect fraud and decide to investigate the 2004 election?

ROBERT F. KENNEDY JR.: Well, my opinion hasn’t changed, that the press has been negligent, and that the large amount of support for the President, and for the people that did vote for the President, that large numbers of them would not have done so, had they known the truth about his policies, and his record. You say my opinion changed, but it hasn’t changed.

You know I’ve known this for many years, because of my anecdotal experience. I give about 40 speeches a year, in red states to Republican audiences, and I get the same enthusiastic responses from those audiences as I get from Liberal college audiences. The only difference is, is that the Republicans often say to me, "How come we’ve never heard this before?" I made the conclusion many years ago that there’s not a huge values difference between Red State Republicans and Blue State Democrats. The distinction is really informational. 80% of Republicans are just Democrats who don’t know what’s going on. And my anecdotal conclusion was confirmed by a survey done immediately after the 2004 election called the PIPA report, which tested Bush supporters and Kerry supporters based upon their knowledge of current events. It found that among Bush supporters, they were widespread in its interpretations, or there were factual errors in the way that they viewed Bush’s major public policy initiatives.

For example, 75% of the Republican respondents believed that Saddam Hussein bombed the World Trade Center, and 72% believed that WMD had been found in Iraq. And most of them believed that the war in Iraq had strong support among Iraq’s Muslim neighbors and our traditional allies in Europe, which of course is wrong. The Democrats as a whole had a much more accurate view of those events. And then PIPA went back twice to these same people. The first time it went back to the people that had these misinterpretations, and asked them where they were getting their news, and invariably they said talk radio and FOX news. And PIPA went back a third time, and made inquiries about their fundamental values, and it did start with a string of hypotheticals:

"What if there were no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq? What if Saddam Hussein had nothing to do with bombing the World Trade Center? What if the U.S. Invasion of Iraq had little support among Iraq’s Muslim neighbors and was largely opposed by Iraq’s Muslim neighbors, and by our troops and allies in Europe? Should we have still gone in?" And roughly 80% of Dem and 80% of Rep said the same thing, "We should not." And so the values were the same. It was the facts, the information, it was the access to information that was different.

BB: Are you then adding a layer of suspicion about the direct manipulation and fraudulent counting through computerized voting?

Thanks to Pheez for sending this in.
Click here for more.

email

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook

Posted: July 21st, 2006
at 9:50am by black octagons


Categories: politricks

Comments: 1 comment



 

One Response to 'RFK and Brad Blog'

Subscribe to comments with RSS or TrackBack to 'RFK and Brad Blog'.

  1. 818117 Blog Verification

    818117

     


 

Leave a Reply