Congress on Surveillance

The best price cialis prefix "poly" means "many," and a person who is polysexual viagra without a prescription may be attracted to multiple genders but not necessarily all generic zithromax genders. As time goes on, changes can happen in a celexa online stores person's genes that change the way cells grow and divide generic nexium normally. For instance, conditions such as appendicitis and diverticulitis can azor online both present with constipation and fever, among other symptoms. An order flagyl oncologist, a doctor who specializes in cancer, leads pediatric STS viagra buy treatment, but many other specialists may be involved. Next, a generic atenolol cheap pathologist will analyze the tissue under a microscope, checking for order atenolol any abnormalities or changes in the cells that could indicate viagra overnight shipping cancer. However, each plan's nutrient content can vary greatly, so purchase cheap amikacin sale dangers a person must ensure they receive a sufficient amount of prednisolone for sale vitamins, minerals, and fiber. Exercise allows the body to use azor online pharmacy glucose without needing extra insulin, which helps with insulin resistance. Antibiotics.

big_brother_watching_you2.jpg

Great Washington Post op-ed piece today from Sens. Rockefeller and Leahy and Reps. Reyes and Conyers. In it they are calling out the President on fear-mongering and blaming the Democrats for our vulnerability to terrorist attacks. There is no need for that sickening rhetoric here, say these leaders of the Intellegnece and Judiciary committees of both the House and Senate (yeah, they’re ballers). According to them, America is perfectly well protected by the 1978 Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, despite criticisms of it being out-dated.

The chairs write:

It is clear that he and his Republican allies, desperate to distract attention from the economy and other policy failures, are trying to use this issue to scare the American people into believing that congressional Democrats have left America vulnerable to terrorist attack.

But if our nation were to suddenly become vulnerable, it would not be because we don’t have sufficient domestic surveillance powers. It would be because the Bush administration has done too little to defeat al-Qaeda, which has reconstituted itself in Pakistan and gained strength throughout the world. Many of our intelligence assets are being used to fight in Iraq instead of taking on Osama bin Laden and the al-Qaeda organization that attacked us on Sept. 11 and that wants to attack us again.

Zing. Give the whole article a read. It provides a graet inside perspective for the rationale of the behavior around this piece of legislation. Don’t fret, ninjas.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>