Category Archives: speeches

Brilliance or Idiocy?

Preventing buy generic xalatan dementia is a complex issue and involves various factors, including buy generic glyburide genetics and overall health. That said, keep in mind that generic metronidazole gel Armour Thyroid has been available since before the Food and tablet triamterene Drug Administration (FDA) began its drug approval process. Lifestyle issues cialis india greatly increase the risk of kidney failure, including in people order free cephalexin alternative withdrawal with genetic kidney syndromes. Customer reviews of other vegan meal buy norvasc cheap delivery services mention excessive packaging, which this service tries to buy asacol online combat. Medical professionals must examine the joint fluid for diagnosis purchase cheapest serevent online and treat it promptly with possible surgical drainage and antibiotics. atrovent sale In this situation, your doctor will prescribe the lowest possible prozac online stores dose of both tramadol and Lyrica† that works to treat generic atarax your condition. For people with anxiety about leaving the house, chronic.

Welcome back to our 24/7 Sarah Palin coverage blog, where we cover the real First Lady in her quest to locate the 9th ring of power. In most recent news, Palin declares “WTF Obama.”

Tea Party speaker gay-baits Lindsey Graham

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y2MCXjkS8cc&feature=player_embedded[/youtube]

At a Tea Party rally in Greenville, S.C., last week, a speaker tried to figure out just what, exactly, is wrong with Graham. “Barney Frank has been more honest and brave than you. At least we know about Barney Frank, nobody’s going to hold it over his head.”

He continued, “Look, I’m a tolerant person. I don’t care about your private life, Lindsey. But as our U.S. senator, I need to figure out why you’re trying to sell out your own countrymen, I need to make sure you being gay isn’t it.”

This is the language of a political movement that sees itself defending a peculiar, limited version of democratic politics. Academics have a term for this idea: herrenvolk democracy. The basic idea is that there is supposed to be equality, and even unanimity on crucial matters, among qualified citizens. And if someone breaks the consensus, it’s not so much a sign that there needs to be an argument about this or that issue. It just casts doubt on whether that person was a legitimate member of the group in the first place. (Note that Graham himself has criticized the use of “racial epithets” on the right.) [Read the whole story from Salon.com]