Major investment bank issues warning on strike against Iran

When purchase gentamicin eye drops online all of the gas is absorbed, the air sacs eventually get cheapest ampicillin low price canada collapse as the obstruction prevents more gas from entering. This order generic viagra is partly because they may not have easy access to order generic viagra prescription and alcohol fresh, healthier food and safe places to exercise. However, this cost of colchicine article should not be used as a substitute for the cheap methotrexate knowledge and expertise of a licensed healthcare professional. Damage from robaxin prescription using nail files or chemicals and trimming cuticles could cause buy generic robaxin a flare in psoriasis nail symptoms. Constrictive pericarditis occurs due cheap viagra in canada to inflammation that causes scarring and thickening of the pericardial order spiriva lining. During psychotherapy, a person will work with a therapist discount griseofulvin to gain a better understanding of their thoughts and behaviors order gel from canada and learn new ways of responding to situations. If a discount mirapex online person does not treat nocturnal hypertension, they may be at cost cialis higher risk of various health complications, including heart attack and stroke..

The banking division of ING Group released a memo on Jan. 9 entitled “Attacking Iran: The market impact of a surprise Israeli strike on its nuclear facilities.”

ING is a global financial services company of Dutch origin that includes banking, insurance, and other divisions. The report was authored by Charles Robinson, the Chief Economist for Emerging Europe, Middle East, and Africa. He also authored an update in ING’s daily update Prophet that further underscored the bank’s perception of the risks of an attack.

ING’s Robertson admitted that an attack on Iran was “high impact, if low probability,” but explained some of the reasons why a strike might go forward. The Jan. 9 dispatch, describes Israel as “not prepared to accept the same doctrine of ‘mutually assured destruction’ that kept the peace during the Cold War. Israel is adamant that this is not an option for such a geographically small country….So if Israel is convinced Iran is aiming to develop a nuclear weapon, it must presumably act at some point.”

via RawStory

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>