Iraq Punditry: Getting Rich by being Wrong vs. Right but Poor

Depending purchase drops work on the stage of cervical cancer, doctors may recommend it generic viagra cheap following surgery or to treat the disease when it has buy methotrexate from us spread to other organs. These are uncomfortable side effects that erythromycin online can occur when you stop taking a drug your body get cialis is used to. Tampon pain may be a sign of buy cheap ventolin alternative an underlying medical condition, and could be an indicator of lasix online stores endometriosis. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved buy nexium without prescription OTC hearing aids as medical devices that people can buy buy zoloft cheapest alternatives india without needing a medical exam or a fitting with an (metacam) generic audiologist. They will ask about symptoms, including the characteristics of the.

“Surely those who warned us not to invade Iraq have been recognized and rewarded, and those who pushed for this disaster face tattered credibility and waning career prospects. Could it be any other way in America?

So we selected the four pundits who were in our judgment the most influentially and disturbingly misguided in their pro-war arguments and the four who were most prescient and forceful in their opposition.  Then we did a career check … and found that something is rotten in the fourth estate.”

A long overdue look at the pre-war statements of:

Tom Friedman
Peter Beinart
Fareed Zakaria
Jeffrey Goldberg
Robert Scheer
William S. Lind
Jonathan Schell
Scott Ritter

Article via RadarOnline.com

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>