D.C. Handgun Ban Struck Down by Federal Appeals Court

If glyburide for sale you're having trouble opening medication bottles, ask your pharmacist about asacol sale putting Alunbrig in an easy-open container. This is not a order cheap atarax sale dosage complete list — it is important for people to inform purchase kenalog online a doctor about all medications, including supplements or illegal drugs. methotrexate sale Individual dietary needs can vary based on factors such as cheap viagra from canada the stage of kidney disease and any other health conditions buy viagra lowest price a person has. Upper body injuries that may require physical cheap cialis in uk therapy include neck, shoulder, arms, and back injuries. African Americans discount prozac may also have certain socioeconomic factors that may affect their generic synthroid side effects and alcohol heart disease outcomes, such as lower income, lower education level, purchase bentyl online unemployment, and certain environmental factors. Eczema patients tend to have more.

March 9 — A U.S. appeals court struck down a three-decade-old District of Columbia law that bans residents from keeping a handgun in their homes, saying the Constitution’s Second Amendment protects an individual right to bear arms.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit in Washington also threw out a district law requiring registered firearms to be kept disassembled or under trigger lock.

It’s the first time a federal appeals court has struck down a gun-control measure on Second Amendment grounds. Nelson Lund, a constitutional law professor at George Mason University in neighboring Virginia, said an appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court is “very likely.”

“This is clearly an extremely significant ruling,” Lund said, “The District of Columbia had some of the most restrictive gun control laws in the country.’

The Second Amendment says, “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.”

Lawyers for the District of Columbia, which banned residents from owning handguns in 1976 for public safety reasons, argued that the amendment guarantees the right to bear arms only for members of a militia.

[Bloomberg]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>