Spying Too Secret For Your Court: AT&T, Gov Tell Ninth

It purchase generic xalatan best price typically starts in early adulthood, but older people may develop buy generic retin-a no prescription usa it due to conditions such as Parkinson's disease or Alzheimer's buy free zoloft best price jelly disease. Side effects from nicotine patches may indicate an incorrect viagra cheap drug dose strength, drug interactions, or inappropriate administration or use. This cheapest mirapex drug has a boxed warning for an increased risk of cheap mirapex tablets death in older adults with dementia-related psychosis. Biology, disorder features, buy cialis online and co-occurring conditions result in autistic people being prone to purchase estrace online insomnia or other sleep disorders. However, unlike usual ultrasound techniques, buy generic cephalexin which involve placing the probe on the outside of the discount aldactone no rx body, TEE uses a thin tube inserted through the mouth. This.

AT&T told an appeals court in a written brief Monday that the case against it for allegedly helping the government spy on its customers should be thrown out, because it cannot defend itself — even by showing a signed order from the government — without endangering national security.

A government brief filed simultaneously backed AT&T’s claims and said a lower court judge had exceeded his authority by not dismissing the suit outright.

Because plaintiffs’ entire action rests upon alleged secret espionage activities, including an alleged secret espionage relationship between AT&T and the Government concerning the alleged activities, this suit must be dismissed now as a matter of law,” the government argued in its brief (.pdf).

The telecom giant and the government are appealing a June ruling in a federal district court that allowed the suit brought by the Electronic Frontier Foundation against the telecom to proceed, despite the government’s invocation of a powerful tool called the “states secrets privilege,” which allows it to have civil cases dismissed when national secrets are involved.

California Northern District Court Chief Judge Vaughn Walker ruled, however, that since the government had admitted it was wiretapping Americans without a warrant and that AT&T had to be involved, the case could go forward tentatively. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals will hear the government and AT&Ts’ appeal in the coming months.

[WIRED]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>