Surprise! Pork-Barrel Spending Drops

Health low price 60 events unique to females, such as pregnancy and menopause, make cheapest tetracycline the condition more common in females than males. Although PsA buying lasix online can occur in people with psoriasis, more research is necessary generic atenolol to determine coffee's effect on PsA, specifically. They may also (ovral overnight shipping find that eating softer, easier-to-digest foods, such as rice or order viagra from us bananas, reduces symptoms. If you have government-funded insurance such as best price viagra Medicare or Medicaid, you are not eligible for the Janssen viagra approved CarePath Savings Program. The FDA has approved vedolizumab, which is cheapest tetracycline available under the brand name Entyvio, as a treatment for buy cheap atenolol online people living with UC. Doctors can identify nodules on the compazine buy drug thyroid glands using ultrasounds and determine whether they are solid zofran alternative or fluid filled. The researchers found that increased fetal movement nasonex no prescription did not have an association with the umbilical cord wrapping arcoxia no prescription around the neck or stillbirth. There are no recommended kidney cancer.

Tax money spent on small projects that only benefit one congressional district or region are often slipped into legislation at the 11th hour — a time-worn and much criticized part of Congress known as pork-barrel spending.

Each year the Citizens Against Government Waste exposes that pork in its annual “Congressional Pig Book.” The group had no problem sniffing out the pork this year, although it says it “will be a smaller pig than usual.”

The private, nonpartisan organization says that reduction is a welcome change from past pork-barrel spending levels.

Why the change in 2006 spending? Partly because only two of the 11 proposed spending bills were passed last year, giving legislators fewer places to hide the pork. Also, the new Democratic Congress enforced a moratorium on earmarks, the projects that members slip into appropriations legislation usually without the full scrutiny of Congress.

Even so, the group says “there is still enough pork to cause concern for taxpayers.”

[ABCNews]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>