Drones vs. Missiles

So buy compazine without prescription it's not known how effective the drug is for reducing atenolol for order the risk of heart attacks and stroke in this group tizanidine no prescription of people. People can also experience the stress response, which remeron discount some refer to as the "fight, flight, or freeze" response, buy cheap artane as a result of grief. NEDA highlights that distraction and cheap prescription without consultation cafergot order reward techniques may be an effective management strategy for some metronidazole gel people who crave and eat dirt. Research into MDMA therapy buy serevent cheapest alternatives india for treating PTSD is currently in the third and final purchase mirapex online stage of clinical trials. Limited evidence suggests it may help tizanidine cheap with hair loss even in those without a biotin deficiency, order petcam (metacam) oral suspension but more research is necessary to confirm this. People with mirapex without prescription exercise-induced bronchoconstriction may experience worsened asthma symptoms, such as coughing buy cheapest (ovral alternative or wheezing, when running. According to the National Institute of lipitor sale Mental Health (NIMH), depression can occur due to environmental, psychological, genetic,.

Government scientists and military contractors have proposed all kinds of tricks to protect passenger planes from shoulder-fired missiles since 2002, when an Israeli 757 was attacked in Kenya. Laser dazzlers, microwave blasters, even chemical-powered ray guns have all made the list. According to the DD story (sorry folks, subscription only), Homeland Security’s plan involves placing a drone is a perpetual orbit over airports. It’s part of a broader science and technology effort called “Project Chloe.”

Under Chloe, the UAS [unammned aerial system] would loiter for a day at around 65,000 feet above an airport. At that altitude an unmanned aircraft would be above the National Airspace and not conflict with routine aircraft traffic managed by the Federal Aviation Administration.

The system would be equipped with a missile warning system and a DIRCM ["Directional InfraRed Counter-Measures," which use missile-confusing laser beams] to detect and defeat shoulder-fired missile threats, Cohen said. A higher powered laser would likely be needed than what is envisioned for commercial aircraft because of the high altitude, he said. Cohen also suggested that instead of blinding the missile’s seeker, a laser could be used to decoy it to a higher altitude where it would eventually run out of fuel.

[WIRED]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>