Obama, Clinton May Skip Early Debates

Treatment nasonex in us Treatment includes taking immunosuppressant medications such as corticosteroids and other discount metronidazole gel disease-modifying therapies. For more information about taking Botox during pregnancy, dexamethasone sale see the "Botox and pregnancy" section above. According to the buy cheap serevent National Cancer Institute, anyone with a family history of BRCA alesse (ovral l) online gene mutations or breast cancer should seek genetic testing. Hard buy robaxin online wax is more difficult for the tiny hairs to move robaxin no prescription out of the ear, which can lead to a blockage, purchase cheap arcoxia sale dangers or an impaction, in the ear canal. Researchers found that pyrantel pamoate sale serious side effects were higher in participants using CPAP than ventolin purchase in the control group. Avoiding triggers where possible and taking synthroid cheapest price antiseizure medication may help people control or prevent partial seizures. If.

What if the media-political complex announced a presidential debate, hired a hall, sent out invitations, lined up 200 folding chairs for the press, and then the major candidates said: “Stick it in your ear. We’re not coming.”

That could happen this year for one good reason: Major candidates are complaining that too many states are planning too many debates too early.

Early debates are helpful to second- and third-tier candidates because those candidates need publicity.

But what do front-runners get from debates? Nothing but risk. They already have publicity. To the top tier, early debates are a negative, an ordeal, a chance for the rest of the pack to nip them in their rear ends.

[Politico]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>