E-Voting Machines not secure?! – hmmm, couldn?t have guessed that one?

Migraine generic pyrantel pamoate is highly individual, and many symptoms vary depending on the cheap augmentin tablets individual experiencing attacks. Various standardized cognitive tests and assessments can cialis free delivery evaluate different aspects of cognitive performance. The findings from the asacol prescription study contribute positively to both Alzheimer's disease prevention research and clozapine online stores public health overall, underscoring the importance of vaccination. Some people buy cialis in canada may find that nasal sprays provide rapid and effective relief, advair for order while others may not notice a significant difference or may zithromax online experience side effects that make the medication less tolerable. However, find clindamycin some doctors also prescribe the medication to treat moderate acne flovent prescription that has not responded to other therapy or quickly relapses lowest price ampicillin after stopping antibiotic treatments. These tests can help identify how canada diflucan likely a person is to potentially pass hemophilia to their cheapest nexium children. "It's good that we have more treatment options and buy methotrexate canada can also individualize patients with various treatments that they may respond.

Well Diebold and the other e-voting machine companies must be pissed. For those ninjas that actually embrace democracy however, this is great news. Remember when those historically democratic districts with these machines mysteriously went for Bush in ‘04, and in other districts with the machines the exit polls didn’t match the “official” reuslts? Hmmmm…

WASHINGTON (AP) – Paperless electronic voting machines in widespread use across the country may be vulnerable to errors or sabotage and cannot be made secure, a draft report by a federal agency said.

The report by researchers at the influential National Institute of Standards and Technology said the paperless voting machines – essentially notebook computers programmed to display ballot images and record voter choices – “in practical terms cannot be made secure.’’

“Many people, especially in the computer engineering and security community, assert that the (voting machines) are vulnerable to undetectable errors as well as malicious software attacks,’’ the report said.

A key weakness is that there is no audit mechanism or paper trail to verify election results other than what the machine itself reports, the report said.

“Potentially, a single programmer could ‘rig’ a major election,’’ the report said.

Couldn’t they have saved some hard-earned taxpayer money and instead of doing a study/report just used some common sense? Actually, that would’ve been way too much to ask…
Story via The Guardian/AP

Read the actual National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) report here

Further Reading:

Great Slate.com article, “Rage Against the Machines

If you want to get yourself real angry, read this article too (it’s from 2003, but still good ish)
Oh, and if you want to learn how to rig one of these voting machines

No Tags

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>